vs.

      Bobcat 320 vs. Komatsu PC03-2

      7 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 980 mm and 800 mm 18 % more or 180 mm
      Clearance 179 mm and 170 mm 5 % more or 9 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 17200 kPa and 15720 kPa 9 % more or 1480 kPa

      Motor

      Full power 11.7 kW and 5.5 kW 53 % more or 6.2 kW

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 2197 mm and 1500 mm 32 % more or 697 mm
      Maximum radius along ground level 3817 mm and 2760 mm 28 % more or 1057 mm
      Maximum loading height 2485 mm and 1990 mm 20 % more or 495 mm

      1 reasons to buy Komatsu PC03-2:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 20.4 l/min and 30 l/min 32 % less or 9.6 l/min

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 1068 mm and 770 mm
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 1114 mm and 900 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 1580 kg and 870 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Kubota and Komatsu

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 230 mm and 180 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum cut height 1574 mm and 2790 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1114 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 900 mm
      5. Clearance 179 mm 5. Clearance 170 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 1068 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 770 mm
      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 980 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 800 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 230 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 180 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      9. Maximum cut height 1574 mm 9. Maximum cut height 2790 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 2485 mm 10. Maximum loading height 1990 mm
      11. Maximum radius along ground level 3817 mm 11. Maximum radius along ground level 2760 mm
      13. Maximum excavation depth 2197 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 1500 mm