- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Bobcat 335 vs. Thomas 35
Bobcat 335 vs. Thomas 35
5 reasons to buy Bobcat 335:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1780 mm and 1580 mm | 11 % more or 200 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 75 l/min and 109.4 l/min | 31 % less or 34.4 l/min |
Motor
| Full power | 29.8 kW and 21.6 kW | 28 % more or 8.2 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 4.6 km/h | 16 % more or 0.9 km/h |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 3529.6 mm and 3425 mm | 3 % more or 104.6 mm |
1 reasons to buy Thomas 35:
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum loading height | 3745 mm and 3532.6 mm | 6 % more or 212.4 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2386.6 mm and 2335 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4159.4 kg and 3230 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Kubota and Isuzu |
| Model | V2203 -M-DI-E2B-BC-1 and 3LD1PA-04 |
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2400 rev / min |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 4901.2 mm and 5010 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1780 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1580 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 2386.6 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2335 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4901.2 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 5010 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 3532.6 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3745 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 3529.6 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 3425 mm |