- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Case CX25 vs. New Holland E25SR
Case CX25 vs. New Holland E25SR
3 reasons to buy Case CX25:
Sizes
| Clearance | 240 mm and 128 mm | 47 % more or 112 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 4550 mm and 4310 mm | 5 % more or 240 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 3270 mm and 3080 mm | 6 % more or 190 mm |
2 reasons to buy New Holland E25SR:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 22600 kPa and 156.9 kPa | 99 % more or 22443.1 kPa |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 2810 mm and 2560 mm | 9 % more or 250 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1500 mm and 1500 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 750 mm and 750 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1500 mm and 1500 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 48 l/min and 48 l/min |
| Working weight | 2520.2 kg and 2650 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Yanmar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 250 mm and 250 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 4130 mm and 4130 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 750 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 750 mm |
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1500 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1500 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1500 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1500 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 240 mm | 5. Clearance | 128 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 250 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 250 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4130 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4130 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 3270 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3080 mm |
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 4550 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 4310 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2560 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2810 mm |