- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Komatsu PC03-2 vs. Bobcat 320
Komatsu PC03-2 vs. Bobcat 320
1 reasons to buy Komatsu PC03-2:
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 20.4 l/min and 30 l/min | 32 % less or 9.6 l/min |
7 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 980 mm and 800 mm | 18 % more or 180 mm |
| Clearance | 179 mm and 170 mm | 5 % more or 9 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 17200 kPa and 15720 kPa | 9 % more or 1480 kPa |
Motor
| Full power | 11.7 kW and 5.5 kW | 53 % more or 6.2 kW |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 2197 mm and 1500 mm | 32 % more or 697 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 3817 mm and 2760 mm | 28 % more or 1057 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 2485 mm and 1990 mm | 20 % more or 495 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 770 mm and 1068 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 900 mm and 1114 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 870 kg and 1580 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Kubota |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 180 mm and 230 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum cut height | 2790 mm and 1574 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 800 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 980 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 900 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1114 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 170 mm | 5. Clearance | 179 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 770 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1068 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 180 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 230 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 9. Maximum cut height | 2790 mm | 9. Maximum cut height | 1574 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 1990 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 2485 mm |
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 2760 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 3817 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 1500 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2197 mm |