- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Terex HR2.0 vs. Thomas 25
Terex HR2.0 vs. Thomas 25
3 reasons to buy Terex HR2.0:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 58.3 l/min and 89.3 l/min | 35 % less or 31.0 l/min |
Motor
Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 4.1 km/h and 4 km/h | 2 % more or 0.1 km/h |
7 reasons to buy Thomas 25:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10.3 rev / min and 10 rev / min | 3 % more or 0.3 rev |
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1470 mm and 1000 mm | 32 % more or 470 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 40.1 l. and 30 l. | 25 % more or 10.1 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 58336.5 kPa and 17995.3 kPa | 69 % more or 40341.2 kPa |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 2900 mm and 2300 mm | 21 % more or 600 mm |
Maximum loading height | 3225 mm and 2600 mm | 19 % more or 625 mm |
Maximum vertical wall digging depth | 2140 mm and 960 mm | 55 % more or 1180 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 1200 mm and 1360 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 2000 kg and 2650 kg |
Motor
Model | L3E-W 262 KL and 3LD1PA-04 |
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Isuzu |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 230 mm and 300 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum cut height | 3620 mm and 4575 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1000 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1470 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1200 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1360 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 230 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 300 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
12. Maximum vertical wall digging depth | 1130 mm | 12. Maximum vertical wall digging depth | 2140 mm |
13. Maximum excavation depth | 2500 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2900 mm |
9. Maximum cut height | 3620 mm | 9. Maximum cut height | 4575 mm |
10. Maximum loading height | 2600 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3225 mm |


