- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Volvo EC35C vs. Bobcat 329
Volvo EC35C vs. Bobcat 329
6 reasons to buy Volvo EC35C:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1620 mm and 1539.2 mm | 5 % more or 80.8 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 27.1 kW and 20.7 kW | 24 % more or 6.4 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.8 km/h and 3.1 km/h | 35 % more or 1.7 km/h |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 3426 mm and 3099.8 mm | 10 % more or 326.2 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 5068 mm and 4876.8 mm | 4 % more or 191.2 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 3529 mm and 3087.6 mm | 13 % more or 441.4 mm |
1 reasons to buy Bobcat 329:
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 53 l/min and 100 l/min | 47 % less or 47 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2477 mm and 2356.1 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3435 kg and 3219.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Kubota |
| Model | D2.2DCAE2 and D1703-M-E2B |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2477 mm and 2356.1 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 4591 mm and 4596.4 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1620 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1539.2 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 2477 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2356.1 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4591 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4596.4 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2477 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2356.1 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 3705 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3087.6 mm |
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 2580 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 4876.8 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 3708 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 3099.8 mm |