- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 613B vs. Caterpillar 641B
Caterpillar 613B vs. Caterpillar 641B
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 613B:
Tractor engine
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 641B:
Tractor engine
| Effective power | 410.1 kW and 111.9 kW | 73 % more or 298.2 kW |
| Displacement | 19.5 l. and 10.4 l. | 47 % more or 9.1 l. |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1059.9 l. and 246.1 l. | 77 % more or 813.8 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 51.5 km/h and 38.6 km/h | 25 % more or 12.9 km/h |
Cup
| Volume with top | 21.4 m3 and 8.4 m3 | 61 % more or 13.0 m3 |
| Maximum cutting depth | 406.4 mm and 170 mm | 58 % more or 236.4 mm |
| Cut width | 3453.4 mm and 2440 mm | 29 % more or 1013.4 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 14305 kg and 53977.5 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | 3208 and D346 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 9780 mm and 14959.6 mm |
| Overall width | 2440 mm and 4038.6 mm |
| Headroom | 2860 mm and 4343.4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 6350 mm and 9448.8 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 18.0x25,12 PR and 37.5x39, 36PR |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 9780 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 14959.6 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2440 mm | 2. Overall width | 4038.6 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 2860 mm | 3. Headroom | 4343.4 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 6350 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 9448.8 mm |