- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 631D vs. Caterpillar 657G
Caterpillar 631D vs. Caterpillar 657G
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 631D:
Cup
| Maximum cutting depth | 482.6 mm and 425 mm | 12 % more or 57.6 mm |
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 657G:
Tractor engine
| Effective power | 447 kW and 335.6 kW | 25 % more or 111.4 kW |
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 18 l. | 1 % more or 0.1 l. |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1597 l. and 946.4 l. | 41 % more or 650.6 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 55.7 km/h and 49.9 km/h | 10 % more or 5.8 km/h |
Cup
| Volume with top | 33.6 m3 and 23.7 m3 | 29 % more or 9.9 m3 |
| Cut width | 3846 mm and 3505.2 mm | 9 % more or 340.8 mm |
| Brimmed volume | 24.5 m3 and 16.1 m3 | 34 % more or 8.4 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 40324.4 kg and 67774 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | 3408 and C18 ACERT |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 14249.4 mm and 16164 mm |
| Overall width | 3962.4 mm and 4344 mm |
| Headroom | 4166.6 mm and 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase | 8778.2 mm and 9956 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 33.25x35, 38PR and 40.5/75 R39 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 14249.4 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 16164 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3962.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 4344 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4166.6 mm | 3. Headroom | 4710 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 8778.2 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 9956 mm |