- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 631G vs. Caterpillar 627B
Caterpillar 631G vs. Caterpillar 627B
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 631G:
Tractor engine
| Displacement | 18 l. and 10.5 l. | 42 % more or 7.5 l. |
| Effective power | 365 kW and 167.8 kW | 54 % more or 197.2 kW |
Cup
| Volume with top | 23.7 m3 and 15.3 m3 | 35 % more or 8.4 m3 |
| Brimmed volume | 16.1 m3 and 10.7 m3 | 34 % more or 5.4 m3 |
| Maximum cutting depth | 437 mm and 340 mm | 22 % more or 97 mm |
| Cut width | 3512 mm and 3025 mm | 14 % more or 487 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 627B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 814 l. | 19 % more or 189.1 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 54.7 km/h and 53.5 km/h | 2 % more or 1.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 46475 kg and 34563.7 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | 3408E and 3306 |
Sizes
| Headroom | 4286 mm and 3627.1 mm |
| Wheelbase | 8769 mm and 7720.6 mm |
| Dimensional length | 14565 mm and 13335 mm |
| Overall width | 3938 mm and 3453.4 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 37.50-R35 and 29.5x29, 28PR |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 14565 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 13335 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3938 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4286 mm | 3. Headroom | 3627.1 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 8769 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 7720.6 mm |