- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 633D vs. Komatsu WS16-2
Caterpillar 633D vs. Komatsu WS16-2
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 633D:
Tractor engine
| Displacement | 18 l. and 12.2 l. | 32 % more or 5.8 l. |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 630 l. | 33 % more or 316.4 l. |
Cup
| Maximum cutting depth | 380 mm and 300 mm | 21 % more or 80 mm |
| Cut width | 3505 mm and 3030 mm | 14 % more or 475 mm |
| Volume with top | 26 m3 and 16 m3 | 38 % more or 10 m3 |
1 reasons to buy Komatsu WS16-2:
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 60 km/h and 48.3 km/h | 19 % more or 11.7 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 45730 kg and 33600 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | 3408 and NTO-6-CI |
Sizes
| Overall width | 3960 mm and 3290 mm |
| Headroom | 4240 mm and 3670 mm |
| Dimensional length | 14400 mm and 12900 mm |
| Wheelbase | 8890 mm and 7400 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 33.25x35, 38PR and 33.5-33-20PR |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 14400 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 12900 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3960 mm | 2. Overall width | 3290 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4240 mm | 3. Headroom | 3670 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 8890 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 7400 mm |