- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 651B vs. Komatsu WS16-2
Caterpillar 651B vs. Komatsu WS16-2
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 651B:
Tractor engine
Displacement | 19.5 l. and 12.2 l. | 37 % more or 7.3 l. |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1059.9 l. and 630 l. | 41 % more or 429.9 l. |
Cup
Brimmed volume | 24.5 m3 and 11 m3 | 55 % more or 13.5 m3 |
Maximum cutting depth | 406.4 mm and 300 mm | 26 % more or 106.4 mm |
Volume with top | 33.6 m3 and 16 m3 | 52 % more or 17.6 m3 |
Cut width | 3633.2 mm and 3030 mm | 17 % more or 603.2 mm |
1 reasons to buy Komatsu WS16-2:
Gear box
Maximum forward speed | 60 km/h and 51.5 km/h | 14 % more or 8.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Total operating unloaded | 57560.9 kg and 33600 kg |
Tractor engine
Model | D346 and NTO-6-CI |
Sizes
Headroom | 4291.6 mm and 3670 mm |
Wheelbase | 9729.2 mm and 7400 mm |
Dimensional length | 15340 mm and 12900 mm |
Overall width | 4320 mm and 3290 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 37.5x39,36PR and 33.5-33-20PR |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 15340 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 12900 mm |
2. Overall width | 4320 mm | 2. Overall width | 3290 mm |
3. Headroom | 4291.6 mm | 3. Headroom | 3670 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 9729.2 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 7400 mm |