- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Caterpillar 657G vs. Caterpillar 641B
Caterpillar 657G vs. Caterpillar 641B
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 657G:
Tractor engine
| Effective power | 447 kW and 410.1 kW | 8 % more or 36.9 kW |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1597 l. and 1059.9 l. | 34 % more or 537.1 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 55.7 km/h and 51.5 km/h | 8 % more or 4.2 km/h |
Cup
| Volume with top | 33.6 m3 and 21.4 m3 | 36 % more or 12.2 m3 |
| Maximum cutting depth | 425 mm and 406.4 mm | 4 % more or 18.6 mm |
| Cut width | 3846 mm and 3453.4 mm | 10 % more or 392.6 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 641B:
Tractor engine
| Displacement | 19.5 l. and 18.1 l. | 7 % more or 1.4 l. |
Cup
| Brimmed volume | 29.1 m3 and 24.5 m3 | 16 % more or 4.6 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 67774 kg and 53977.5 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | C18 ACERT and D346 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 16164 mm and 14959.6 mm |
| Overall width | 4344 mm and 4038.6 mm |
| Headroom | 4710 mm and 4343.4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 9956 mm and 9448.8 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 40.5/75 R39 and 37.5x39, 36PR |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 16164 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 14959.6 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 4344 mm | 2. Overall width | 4038.6 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4710 mm | 3. Headroom | 4343.4 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 9956 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 9448.8 mm |