- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Komatsu WS16-2 vs. Caterpillar 627B
Komatsu WS16-2 vs. Caterpillar 627B
6 reasons to buy Komatsu WS16-2:
Tractor engine
| Displacement | 12.2 l. and 10.5 l. | 14 % more or 1.7 l. |
Road scraper engine
| Displacement | 12.2 l. and 10.5 l. | 14 % more or 1.7 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 60 km/h and 54.7 km/h | 9 % more or 5.3 km/h |
Cup
| Volume with top | 16 m3 and 15.3 m3 | 4 % more or 0.7 m3 |
| Brimmed volume | 11 m3 and 10.7 m3 | 3 % more or 0.3 m3 |
| Cut width | 3030 mm and 3025 mm | 0 % more or 5 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 627B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 630 l. | 37 % more or 373.1 l. |
Cup
| Maximum cutting depth | 340 mm and 300 mm | 12 % more or 40 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 33600 kg and 34563.7 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | NTO-6-CI and 3306 |
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 7400 mm and 7720.6 mm |
| Dimensional length | 12900 mm and 13335 mm |
| Overall width | 3290 mm and 3453.4 mm |
| Headroom | 3670 mm and 3627.1 mm |
Road scraper engine
| Model | NTO-6-CI and 3306 |
Operation
| Tyre size | 33.5-33-20PR and 29.5x29, 28PR |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 12900 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 13335 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3290 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 3670 mm | 3. Headroom | 3627.1 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 7400 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 7720.6 mm |