- Home/
- Comparison/
- Self-Powered Scraper/
- Komatsu WS16S-2 vs. Caterpillar 651E
Komatsu WS16S-2 vs. Caterpillar 651E
1 reasons to buy Komatsu WS16S-2:
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 52 km/h and 50 km/h | 4 % more or 2 km/h |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 651E:
Tractor engine
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 271.4 kW | 34 % more or 138.7 kW |
| Displacement | 27 l. and 14 l. | 48 % more or 13 l. |
Cup
| Volume with top | 33.6 m3 and 16 m3 | 52 % more or 17.6 m3 |
| Brimmed volume | 24.5 m3 and 11 m3 | 55 % more or 13.5 m3 |
| Maximum cutting depth | 660 mm and 370 mm | 44 % more or 290 mm |
| Cut width | 3850 mm and 3180 mm | 17 % more or 670 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Total operating unloaded | 30800 kg and 60950 kg |
| Total operating loaded | 53400 kg and 108150 kg |
Tractor engine
| Model | Cummins NTA855-C and 3412 |
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Sizes
| Overall width | 3490 mm and 4350 mm |
| Headroom | 4480 mm and 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2400 mm and 9920 mm |
| Dimensional length | 12775 mm and 16140 mm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 8 and 8 |
Cup
| Nominal payload | 22400 kg and 47200 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 12775 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 16140 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3490 mm | 2. Overall width | 4350 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4480 mm | 3. Headroom | 4710 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2400 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 9920 mm |