- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Bobcat T650 vs. Gehl RT175
Bobcat T650 vs. Gehl RT175
3 reasons to buy Bobcat T650:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 103.3 l. and 92 l. | 11 % more or 11.3 l. |
Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 8.2 km/h | 23 % more or 2.4 km/h |
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 40 kPa and 42.7 kPa | 6 % less or 2.7 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Gehl RT175:
Sizes
Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 876 mm and 868.7 mm | 1 % more or 7.3 mm |
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 13.3 l. and 11.4 l. | 14 % more or 1.9 l. |
Load-transfer device
Tipping load | 2268 kg and 3330.7 kg | 32 % less or 1062.7 kg |
Hydraulic system
Pump flow rate | 70 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 20 % less or 17.1 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with bucket | 3474.7 mm and 3658 mm |
Width between caterpillar tracks | 1853.2 mm and 1636 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2066.5 mm and 2103 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 4281.9 kg and 3903.2 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Load-transfer device
Workload | 1664.7 kg and 793.8 kg |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1499.6 mm and 1392 mm |
Caterpillar track width | 320 mm and 320 mm |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 2066.5 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2103 mm |
8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 876 mm |
1. Length with bucket | 3474.7 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3658 mm |
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1853.2 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1636 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1499.6 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1392 mm |