- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Bobcat T770 vs. Komatsu CK35-1
Bobcat T770 vs. Komatsu CK35-1
5 reasons to buy Bobcat T770:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm and 870 mm | 2 % more or 13.9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 103 l. and 64 l. | 38 % more or 39 l. |
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 7.3 km/h | 31 % more or 3.3 km/h |
| Maximum speed at high range | 17.2 km/h and 12 km/h | 30 % more or 5.2 km/h |
Motor
| Effective power | 68.6 kW and 62.6 kW | 9 % more or 6.0 kW |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu CK35-1:
Sizes
| Machine rear swing radius from center | 1590 mm and 2235.2 mm | 29 % less or 645.2 mm |
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 3570 kg and 4503.7 kg | 21 % less or 933.7 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 80 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 8 % less or 7.1 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm and 2030 mm |
| Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm and 3550 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm and 2130 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4684.2 kg and 4330 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 1576.2 kg and 1250 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 24131.6 kPa and 20994.5 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3550 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2030 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2130 mm |
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 870 mm |