- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Case TR320 vs. Bobcat T770
Case TR320 vs. Bobcat T770
3 reasons to buy Case TR320:
Sizes
| Machine rear swing radius from center | 1788.2 mm and 2235.2 mm | 20 % less or 447.0 mm |
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 2903 kg and 4503.7 kg | 36 % less or 1600.7 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 46 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 47 % less or 41.1 l/min |
7 reasons to buy Bobcat T770:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm and 540 mm | 39 % more or 343.9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 103 l. and 96.5 l. | 6 % more or 6.5 l. |
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 9.3 km/h | 12 % more or 1.3 km/h |
| Maximum speed at high range | 17.2 km/h and 13.4 km/h | 22 % more or 3.8 km/h |
Motor
| Effective power | 68.6 kW and 62.6 kW | 9 % more or 6.0 kW |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 29 kPa and 33.1 kPa | 12 % less or 4.1 kPa |
| Caterpillar track width | 449.6 mm and 400 mm | 11 % more or 49.6 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with bucket | 3600 mm and 3596.6 mm |
| Length without bucket | 3000 mm and 2895.6 mm |
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 1900 mm and 2011.7 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2000 mm and 2072.6 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4354.5 kg and 4684.2 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 1451.5 kg and 1576.2 kg |
| Shovel width | 1981.2 mm and 2032 mm |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 20684.3 kPa and 24131.6 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with bucket | 3600 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1900 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm |
| 6. Length without bucket | 3000 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 2895.6 mm |
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 540 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm |