- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Caterpillar 279C vs. Bobcat T870
Caterpillar 279C vs. Bobcat T870
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 279C:
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 2940.6 kg and 4568.6 kg | 36 % less or 1628.0 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 84 l/min and 90.1 l/min | 7 % less or 6.1 l/min |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 27.6 kPa and 32.4 kPa | 15 % less or 4.8 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Bobcat T870:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm and 594 mm | 36 % more or 332.6 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 134.8 l. and 98 l. | 27 % more or 36.8 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 15.1 l. and 14 l. | 7 % more or 1.1 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 74 kW and 62.6 kW | 15 % more or 11.4 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm and 2109.2 mm |
| Length with bucket | 3679 mm and 3910.6 mm |
| Length without bucket | 2960 mm and 3029.7 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2117 mm and 2118.4 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4486.9 kg and 5750.6 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 1451.5 kg and 2284.3 kg |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1767 mm and 1749.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with bucket | 3679 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3910.6 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2109.2 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2117 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2118.4 mm |
| 6. Length without bucket | 2960 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 3029.7 mm |
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 594 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1767 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1749.6 mm |