- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Caterpillar 297C vs. Bobcat T650
Caterpillar 297C vs. Bobcat T650
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 297C:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 14 l. and 11.4 l. | 19 % more or 2.6 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 70.1 kW and 55.4 kW | 21 % more or 14.7 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 84 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 4 % less or 3.1 l/min |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 27.7 kPa and 40 kPa | 31 % less or 12.3 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Bobcat T650:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm and 767 mm | 12 % more or 101.7 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 9 km/h | 15 % more or 1.6 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 103.3 l. and 98 l. | 5 % more or 5.3 l. |
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 3330.7 kg and 3894.1 kg | 14 % less or 563.4 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with bucket | 3833 mm and 3474.7 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2115 mm and 2066.5 mm |
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm and 1853.2 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4599 kg and 4281.9 kg |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 2068.8 kg and 1664.7 kg |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1808 mm and 1499.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with bucket | 3833 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3474.7 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1853.2 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2115 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2066.5 mm |
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 767 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1808 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1499.6 mm |