- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Gehl RT210 vs. Bobcat T320
Gehl RT210 vs. Bobcat T320
3 reasons to buy Gehl RT210:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 14.4 l. and 13.6 l. | 6 % more or 0.8 l. |
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 2721.6 kg and 4176.7 kg | 35 % less or 1455.1 kg |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track width | 450 mm and 449.6 mm | 0 % more or 0.4 mm |
5 reasons to buy Bobcat T320:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm and 340 mm | 63 % more or 586.6 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 8.7 km/h | 18 % more or 1.9 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 98.4 l. and 92 l. | 7 % more or 6.4 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 80.3 l/min and 82.5 l/min | 3 % less or 2.2 l/min |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 26.9 kPa and 32.4 kPa | 17 % less or 5.5 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 1765 mm and 1981.2 mm |
| Length with bucket | 3868 mm and 3630.2 mm |
| Length without bucket | 2908 mm and 2907.8 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2111 mm and 2054.4 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4486 kg and 4400.8 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 952.5 kg and 2088.3 kg |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1483 mm and 1618.5 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 6. Length without bucket | 2908 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 2907.8 mm |
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 340 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm |
| 1. Length with bucket | 3868 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3630.2 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1765 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981.2 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2111 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2054.4 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1483 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1618.5 mm |