- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- New Holland C190 vs. Bobcat T770
New Holland C190 vs. Bobcat T770
2 reasons to buy New Holland C190:
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 3758 kg and 4503.7 kg | 17 % less or 745.7 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 82.9 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 5 % less or 4.2 l/min |
7 reasons to buy Bobcat T770:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm and 810 mm | 8 % more or 73.9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 103 l. and 81.4 l. | 21 % more or 21.6 l. |
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 8.2 km/h | 23 % more or 2.4 km/h |
| Maximum speed at high range | 17.2 km/h and 12.9 km/h | 25 % more or 4.3 km/h |
Motor
| Effective power | 68.6 kW and 55 kW | 20 % more or 13.6 kW |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 29 kPa and 33.1 kPa | 12 % less or 4.1 kPa |
| Caterpillar track width | 449.6 mm and 440 mm | 2 % more or 9.6 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 2090 mm and 2011.7 mm |
| Length with bucket | 3770 mm and 3596.6 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2020 mm and 2072.6 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4450 kg and 4684.2 kg |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 1316 kg and 1576.2 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 21029 kPa and 24131.6 kPa |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1640 mm and 1645.9 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 810 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm |
| 1. Length with bucket | 3770 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2090 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2020 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1640 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1645.9 mm |