- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 69D ejector vs. Komatsu HD320-3
Caterpillar 69D ejector vs. Komatsu HD320-3
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 69D ejector:
Weight
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 69 % and 68 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 500 l. | 6 % more or 30 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 380.3 kW and 302 kW | 21 % more or 78.3 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
| Maximum speed | 76.6 km/h and 62 km/h | 19 % more or 14.6 km/h |
2 reasons to buy Komatsu HD320-3:
Weight
| Loaded front weight distribution | 32 % and 31 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Dump
| Lifting capacity with top | 24 m3 and 18.2 m3 | 24 % more or 5.8 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 35607 kg and 25750 kg |
Sizes
| Headroom | 3442 mm and 3850 mm |
| Dimensional length | 7830 mm and 7650 mm |
| Overall width | 3665 mm and 3670 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 18x33 2 ** Radial and 18.00-25-32 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3408E HEUI and NTA855 |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 36287.4 kg and 29029.9 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 7830 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 7650 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3665 mm | 2. Overall width | 3670 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 3442 mm | 3. Headroom | 3850 mm |