- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 785 vs. Euclid R32
Caterpillar 785 vs. Euclid R32
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 785:
Weight
| Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 50 % | 6 % more or 3 % |
| Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 32 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1893 l. and 600 l. | 68 % more or 1293 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 1029 kW and 299 kW | 71 % more or 730 kW |
| Displacement | 51.8 l. and 12 l. | 77 % more or 39.8 l. |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 6 and 5 | 17 % more or 1 |
Dump
| Brimmed lifting capacity | 57 m3 and 14.6 m3 | 74 % more or 42.4 m3 |
| Lifting capacity with top | 78 m3 and 21 m3 | 73 % more or 57 m3 |
3 reasons to buy Euclid R32:
Weight
| Unloaded front weight distribution | 50 % and 47 % | 6 % more or 3 % |
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 57 km/h and 56 km/h | 2 % more or 1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 96353 kg and 23000 kg |
| Laden weight | 249433 kg and 55600 kg |
Sizes
| Headroom | 5770 mm and 3600 mm |
| Wheelbase | 5180 mm and 3650 mm |
| Unloading height | 11200 mm and 7730 mm |
| Dimensional length | 11020 mm and 8035 mm |
| Overall width | 6630 mm and 3600 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 33.00-51 50PR (E-4) and 18.00-25/32 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
| Model | 3512 and TD 122KE |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 136077.7 kg and 32567.9 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8035 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 6630 mm | 2. Overall width | 3600 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 5770 mm | 3. Headroom | 3600 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3650 mm |
| 6. Unloading height | 11200 mm | 6. Unloading height | 7730 mm |