vs.

      Hitachi EH3500ACII vs. Komatsu HD325-3

      8 reasons to buy Hitachi EH3500ACII:

      Weight

      Loaded rear weight distribution 69 % and 68 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 2950 l. and 500 l. 83 % more or 2450 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 531 l. and 133 l. 75 % more or 398 l.
      Engine oil volume 200 l. and 38 l. 81 % more or 162 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 789 l. and 110 l. 86 % more or 679 l.

      Motor

      Full power 1491.4 kW and 326.6 kW 78 % more or 1164.8 kW
      Displacement 50.3 l. and 18.8 l. 63 % more or 31.5 l.

      Dump

      Lifting capacity with top 111 m3 and 24 m3 78 % more or 87 m3

      2 reasons to buy Komatsu HD325-3:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 31 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 62 km/h and 56 km/h 10 % more or 6 km/h

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 139997.7 kg and 26600 kg
      Laden weight 324994.4 kg and 58600 kg
      Unloaded front weight distribution 48 % and 48 %
      Unloaded rear weight distribution 52 % and 52 %

      Sizes

      Dimensional length 13500 mm and 7650 mm
      Overall width 8010 mm and 3670 mm
      Headroom 6770 mm and 3950 mm

      Operation

      Tyre size 37.00R57 E4 Radial and 18.00-33-28

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Cummins
      Model QSK50 and KT1150
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Dump

      Nominal payload 185000 kg and 29029.9 kg
      Discharge angle degrees and 61 degrees

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 13500 mm 1. Dimensional length 7650 mm
      2. Overall width 8010 mm 2. Overall width 3670 mm
      3. Headroom 6770 mm 3. Headroom 3950 mm

      Dump

      8. Discharge angle degrees 8. Discharge angle 61 degrees