vs.

      Hitachi EH3500ACII vs. Komatsu HD465-5

      12 reasons to buy Hitachi EH3500ACII:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 48 % and 47 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 69 % and 68 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 2950 l. and 780 l. 74 % more or 2170 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 531 l. and 171 l. 68 % more or 360 l.
      Engine oil volume 200 l. and 52 l. 74 % more or 148 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 789 l. and 95 l. 88 % more or 694 l.

      Motor

      Full power 1491.4 kW and 551.1 kW 63 % more or 940.3 kW
      Effective power 1397.4 kW and 533.2 kW 62 % more or 864.2 kW
      Displacement 50.3 l. and 23.2 l. 54 % more or 27.1 l.
      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 74 m3 and 25 m3 66 % more or 49 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 111 m3 and 34.2 m3 69 % more or 76.8 m3

      5 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 52 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 31 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1900 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 56 km/h 20 % more or 14 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 17.5 sec 34 % less or 6.0 sec

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 139997.7 kg and 42500 kg
      Laden weight 324994.4 kg and 96100 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 37.00R57 E4 Radial and 24.00R35

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Komatsu
      Model QSK50 and SAA6D170E
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Dump

      Nominal payload 185000 kg and 49895.2 kg

      Images