- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Hitachi EH3500ACII vs. Komatsu HD785-1
Hitachi EH3500ACII vs. Komatsu HD785-1
10 reasons to buy Hitachi EH3500ACII:
Weight
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 52 % and 51.8 % | 0 % more or 0.2 % |
Loaded rear weight distribution | 69 % and 67.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 2950 l. and 1240 l. | 58 % more or 1710 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 531 l. and 240 l. | 55 % more or 291 l. |
Engine oil volume | 200 l. and 150 l. | 25 % more or 50 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 789 l. and 460 l. | 42 % more or 329 l. |
Motor
Full power | 1491.4 kW and 671.1 kW | 55 % more or 820.3 kW |
Effective power | 1397.4 kW and 654 kW | 53 % more or 743.4 kW |
Displacement | 50.3 l. and 37.8 l. | 25 % more or 12.5 l. |
Dump
Lifting capacity with top | 111 m3 and 51.8 m3 | 53 % more or 59.2 m3 |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu HD785-1:
Weight
Unloaded front weight distribution | 48.2 % and 48 % | 0 % more or 0.2 % |
Loaded front weight distribution | 32.3 % and 31 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 70 km/h and 56 km/h | 20 % more or 14 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 139997.7 kg and 51500 kg |
Laden weight | 324994.4 kg and 129555 kg |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 13500 mm and 10130 mm |
Overall width | 8010 mm and 5000 mm |
Headroom | 6770 mm and 4870 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 37.00R57 E4 Radial and 24.00-49-42PR |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSK50 and KT-2300 |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Dump
Nominal payload | 185000 kg and 78000 kg |
Discharge angle | degrees and 64 degrees |
Images
Sizes
3. Headroom | 6770 mm | 3. Headroom | 4870 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 13500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 10130 mm |
2. Overall width | 8010 mm | 2. Overall width | 5000 mm |
Dump
8. Discharge angle | degrees | 8. Discharge angle | 64 degrees |


