vs.

      Hitachi EH4500-2 vs. Komatsu HD465-5

      13 reasons to buy Hitachi EH4500-2:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 50.2 % and 47 % 6 % more or 3.2 %
      Loaded front weight distribution 34 % and 32 % 6 % more or 2 %

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 1256 l. and 95 l. 92 % more or 1161 l.
      Fuel Capacity 3785 l. and 780 l. 79 % more or 3005 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 697 l. and 171 l. 75 % more or 526 l.
      Engine oil volume 242 l. and 52 l. 79 % more or 190 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 223 l. and 126.5 l. 43 % more or 96.5 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 65 l. and 23.2 l. 64 % more or 41.8 l.
      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10
      Full power 2014 kW and 551.1 kW 73 % more or 1462.9 kW
      Effective power 1939 kW and 533.2 kW 73 % more or 1405.8 kW

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 108 m3 and 25 m3 77 % more or 83 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 159 m3 and 34.2 m3 78 % more or 124.8 m3

      5 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 49.8 % 6 % more or 3.2 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 67 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1900 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 66.9 km/h 4 % more or 3.1 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 22 sec 48 % less or 10.5 sec

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 198096 kg and 42500 kg
      Laden weight 480362 kg and 96100 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 50.90R57 E4 Radial and 24.00R35

      Motor

      Manufacturer Detroit diesel and Komatsu
      Aspiration Turbocharged engine and the subsequent air cooling to a low temperature and turbocharging
      Model DDEC IV 16V-4000 and SAA6D170E

      Dump

      Nominal payload 281227.3 kg and 49895.2 kg

      Images