- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Hitachi EH700-2 vs. Komatsu HD465-5
Hitachi EH700-2 vs. Komatsu HD465-5
6 reasons to buy Hitachi EH700-2:
Weight
| Unloaded front weight distribution | 49 % and 47 % | 4 % more or 2 % |
| Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 32 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 61 l. and 52 l. | 15 % more or 9 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
| Maximum speed | 76 km/h and 70 km/h | 8 % more or 6 km/h |
12 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:
Weight
| Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 51 % | 4 % more or 2 % |
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 454 l. | 42 % more or 326 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 171 l. and 159 l. | 7 % more or 12 l. |
| Differential/final drive fluid volume | 126.5 l. and 50.3 l. | 60 % more or 76.2 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 23.2 l. and 15 l. | 35 % more or 8.2 l. |
| Effective power | 533.2 kW and 357.9 kW | 33 % more or 175.3 kW |
| Full power | 551.1 kW and 391.5 kW | 29 % more or 159.6 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 7 and 6 | 14 % more or 1 |
Dump
| Brimmed lifting capacity | 25 m3 and 17 m3 | 32 % more or 8 m3 |
| Lifting capacity with top | 34.2 m3 and 24 m3 | 30 % more or 10.2 m3 |
| Lifting time | 11.5 sec and 13.9 sec | 17 % less or 2.4 sec |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 31900 kg and 42500 kg |
| Laden weight | 69900 kg and 96100 kg |
Operation
| Tyre size | 18R33(**)E4 Radial and 24.00R35 |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Komatsu |
| Model | QSX15-525 and SAA6D170E |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Allison M5610A planetary, fully automatic powershift and automatic |
Images