vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Euclid R32

      11 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 50 % 6 % more or 3 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 780 l. and 600 l. 23 % more or 180 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 171 l. and 70 l. 59 % more or 101 l.
      Engine oil volume 52 l. and 37 l. 29 % more or 15 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 95 l. and 75 l. 21 % more or 20 l.

      Motor

      Full power 551.1 kW and 299 kW 46 % more or 252.1 kW
      Displacement 23.2 l. and 12 l. 48 % more or 11.2 l.

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 5 29 % more or 2
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 57 km/h 19 % more or 13 km/h

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 25 m3 and 14.6 m3 42 % more or 10.4 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 34.2 m3 and 21 m3 39 % more or 13.2 m3

      3 reasons to buy Euclid R32:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 50 % and 47 % 6 % more or 3 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Gear box

      Reverse gears number 5 and 1 80 % more or 4

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 32 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 68 %
      Weight without load 42500 kg and 23000 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 55600 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 18.00-25/32

      Motor

      Model SAA6D170E and TD 122KE
      Cylinders number 6 and 6
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging
      Manufacturer Komatsu and Volvo

      Gear box

      Transmission type automatic and planetary gear

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 32567.9 kg

      Images