vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Euclid R85B

      4 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 67 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 54 km/h 23 % more or 16 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 13 sec 12 % less or 1.5 sec

      13 reasons to buy Euclid R85B:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 33 % and 32 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Engine oil volume 140.1 l. and 52 l. 63 % more or 88.1 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 147.6 l. and 126.5 l. 14 % more or 21.1 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 393.7 l. and 95 l. 76 % more or 298.7 l.
      Fuel Capacity 1003.1 l. and 780 l. 22 % more or 223.1 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 268.8 l. and 171 l. 36 % more or 97.8 l.

      Motor

      Full power 689.8 kW and 551.1 kW 20 % more or 138.7 kW
      Effective power 645 kW and 533.2 kW 17 % more or 111.8 kW
      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev
      Displacement 37.7 l. and 23.2 l. 38 % more or 14.5 l.
      Cylinders number 12 and 6 50 % more or 6

      Dump

      Lifting capacity with top 51.3 m3 and 34.2 m3 33 % more or 17.1 m3
      Brimmed lifting capacity 35.6 m3 and 25 m3 30 % more or 10.6 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 42500 kg and 59874.2 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 143017.7 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 24.00-49(48)E-3

      Motor

      Manufacturer Komatsu and Cummins
      Model SAA6D170E and KT38-C
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Transmission type automatic and Allison DP-8963 planetary
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 85300 kg

      Images