- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Euclid R85B
Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Euclid R85B
4 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:
Weight
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 7 and 6 | 14 % more or 1 |
Maximum speed | 70 km/h and 54 km/h | 23 % more or 16 km/h |
Dump
Lifting time | 11.5 sec and 13 sec | 12 % less or 1.5 sec |
13 reasons to buy Euclid R85B:
Weight
Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 32 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Operation
Engine oil volume | 140.1 l. and 52 l. | 63 % more or 88.1 l. |
Differential/final drive fluid volume | 147.6 l. and 126.5 l. | 14 % more or 21.1 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 393.7 l. and 95 l. | 76 % more or 298.7 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 780 l. | 22 % more or 223.1 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 268.8 l. and 171 l. | 36 % more or 97.8 l. |
Motor
Full power | 689.8 kW and 551.1 kW | 20 % more or 138.7 kW |
Effective power | 645 kW and 533.2 kW | 17 % more or 111.8 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Displacement | 37.7 l. and 23.2 l. | 38 % more or 14.5 l. |
Cylinders number | 12 and 6 | 50 % more or 6 |
Dump
Lifting capacity with top | 51.3 m3 and 34.2 m3 | 33 % more or 17.1 m3 |
Brimmed lifting capacity | 35.6 m3 and 25 m3 | 30 % more or 10.6 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 42500 kg and 59874.2 kg |
Laden weight | 96100 kg and 143017.7 kg |
Operation
Tyre size | 24.00R35 and 24.00-49(48)E-3 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Cummins |
Model | SAA6D170E and KT38-C |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Gear box
Transmission type | automatic and Allison DP-8963 planetary |
Reverse gears number | 1 and 1 |
Dump
Nominal payload | 49895.2 kg and 85300 kg |