- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Terex TR35 vs. Caterpillar 69D ejector
Terex TR35 vs. Caterpillar 69D ejector
2 reasons to buy Terex TR35:
Weight
| Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 31 % | 6 % more or 2 % |
Dump
| Lifting capacity with top | 19.4 m3 and 18.2 m3 | 6 % more or 1.2 m3 |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 69D ejector:
Weight
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 69 % and 67 % | 3 % more or 2 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 371 l. | 30 % more or 159 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 380.3 kW and 298.3 kW | 22 % more or 82.0 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 76.6 km/h and 59 km/h | 23 % more or 17.6 km/h |
| Forward gears number | 8 and 5 | 37 % more or 3 |
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 23722.9 kg and 35607 kg |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 8000 mm and 7830 mm |
| Overall width | 4000 mm and 3665 mm |
| Headroom | 3900 mm and 3442 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 18.00-25 (32PR) E-3 and 18x33 2 ** Radial |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSM11-C400E and 3408E HEUI |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 31751.5 kg and 36287.4 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 8000 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 7830 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 4000 mm | 2. Overall width | 3665 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 3900 mm | 3. Headroom | 3442 mm |