- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Hitachi EX8000-6 vs. Komatsu PC8000
Hitachi EX8000-6 vs. Komatsu PC8000
6 reasons to buy Hitachi EX8000-6:
Shovel
| Bucket initial volume | 40 m3 and 38 m3 | 5 % more or 2 m3 |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 100 amperes | 29 % more or 40 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 14900 l. and 14000 l. | 6 % more or 900 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 1228 l. and 950 l. | 23 % more or 278 l. |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 32 and 16 | 50 % more or 16 |
Loading bucket
| Maximum digging radius | 18500 mm and 16100 mm | 13 % more or 2400 mm |
8 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 9700 l. | 16 % more or 1800 l. |
| Rotation speed | 3.5 rev / min and 3.2 rev / min | 9 % more or 0.3 rev |
| Engine oil volume | 580 l. and 520 l. | 10 % more or 60 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 3000 kW and 2893.3 kW | 4 % more or 106.7 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 2.2 km/h and 2 km/h | 9 % more or 0.2 km/h |
| Lower rollers number | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
| Track shoes number on either side | 48 and 39 | 19 % more or 9 |
| Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 1850 mm | 65 % more or 3490 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Komatsu |
| Model | QSK60C and 2 x SDA16V160 |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging and cooling at the outlet |
Loading bucket
| Handle pressure force | 874502.6 Nm and 2320 Nm |
Carrier
| Upper rollers number | 3 and 3 |
Images
Loading bucket
| 19. Maximum digging radius | 18500 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Bucket loader support width | 1850 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm |