- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Liebherr R9350
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Liebherr R9350
7 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 19730 mm and 16300 mm | 17 % more or 3430 mm |
Shovel
| Bucket initial volume | 38 m3 and 18 m3 | 53 % more or 20 m3 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 14000 l. and 5350 l. | 62 % more or 8650 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 4200 l. | 63 % more or 7300 l. |
Loading bucket
| Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm and 13750 mm | 15 % more or 2350 mm |
Carrier
| Upper rollers number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
| Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 850 mm | 84 % more or 4490 mm |
5 reasons to buy Liebherr R9350:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 9500 mm and 8090 mm | 15 % more or 1410 mm |
Operation
| Rotation speed | 3.7 rev / min and 3.5 rev / min | 5 % more or 0.2 rev |
| Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 100 amperes | 33 % more or 50 amperes |
Carrier
| Lower rollers number | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
| Maximum travel speed | 3 km/h and 2.2 km/h | 27 % more or 0.8 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Backhoe shovel boom / section | Boom 37'9" (11500mm) / Section 18' (5500mm) and 9.3 m boom / 4.2 m Section |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Cummins |
| Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and QSK45 |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and cooling at the outlet and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
Loading bucket
| Loading bucket | Boom 29'10" (9100mm) / Section 11'2" (3400mm) and 6.75 boom / 4.2 m Section |
| Handle pressure force | 2320 Nm and 1300 Nm |
Carrier
| Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 4600 mm and 850 mm |
Images
Loading bucket
| 19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 13750 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 850 mm |