- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Liebherr R996
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Liebherr R996
7 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Shovel
| Bucket initial volume | 38 m3 and 33.9 m3 | 11 % more or 4.1 m3 |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 8200 l. | 29 % more or 3300 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14000 l. and 13000 l. | 7 % more or 1000 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 3000 kW and 2237.1 kW | 25 % more or 762.9 kW |
Loading bucket
| Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm and 15600 mm | 3 % more or 500 mm |
Carrier
| Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 1400 mm | 74 % more or 3940 mm |
| Lower rollers number | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Liebherr R996:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 8800 mm and 8090 mm | 8 % more or 710 mm |
| Maximum radius on ground level | 20000 mm and 19730 mm | 1 % more or 270 mm |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 100 amperes | 33 % more or 50 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Backhoe shovel boom / section | Boom 37'9" (11500mm) / Section 18' (5500mm) and 11.75 m boom / 5 m Section |
Operation
| Rotation speed | 3.5 rev / min and 3.5 rev / min |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and cooling at the outlet and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
| Cylinders number | 16 and 16 |
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Cummins |
| Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and 2 x K 1800 E |
Loading bucket
| Loading bucket | Boom 29'10" (9100mm) / Section 11'2" (3400mm) and 8 m boom / 5 m Section |
| Handle pressure force | 2320 Nm and 700930.8 Nm |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 2.2 km/h and 2.2 km/h |
| Upper rollers number | 3 and 3 |
| Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 4600 mm and 1400 mm |
Images
Loading bucket
| 19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 15600 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 1400 mm |