- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH170
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH170
10 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Shovel boom/sections 1
Maximum excavation depth | 8090 mm and 7000 mm | 13 % more or 1090 mm |
Shovel
Bucket initial volume | 38 m3 and 21 m3 | 45 % more or 17 m3 |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 3000 l. | 74 % more or 8500 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 14000 l. and 6300 l. | 55 % more or 7700 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 3000 kW and 1491.4 kW | 50 % more or 1508.6 kW |
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1750 rev / min | 3 % more or 50 rev |
Loading bucket
Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm and 15300 mm | 5 % more or 800 mm |
Carrier
Lower rollers number | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
Track shoes number on either side | 48 and 42 | 12 % more or 6 |
Upper rollers number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy Terex RH170:
Operation
Rotation speed | 4.7 rev / min and 3.5 rev / min | 26 % more or 1.2 rev |
Generator current strength | 350 amperes and 100 amperes | 71 % more or 250 amperes |
Motor
Cylinders number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 2.6 km/h and 2.2 km/h | 15 % more or 0.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Shovel boom/sections 1
Backhoe shovel boom / section | Boom 37'9" (11500mm) / Section 18' (5500mm) and Boom 31'2" (9500mm)/Section 14'9" (4500mm) |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Cummins |
Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and 2x KTA 38 C-1200 |
Aspiration | turbocharging and cooling at the outlet and Turbocharging with charge air cooler |
Loading bucket
Handle pressure force | 2320 Nm and 2237.1 Nm |
Loading bucket | Boom 29'10" (9100mm) / Section 11'2" (3400mm) and Boom 7.3 m (23'11") Section 4.6 m (15'1'') |
Carrier
Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 4600 mm and 1200 mm |
Images
Loading bucket
19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 15300 mm |




