- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH90C
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH90C
9 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Shovel
Bucket initial volume | 38 m3 and 8 m3 | 79 % more or 30 m3 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 14000 l. and 3200 l. | 77 % more or 10800 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 2000 l. | 83 % more or 9500 l. |
Motor
Cylinders number | 16 and 6 | 62 % more or 10 |
Effective power | 3000 kW and 823.3 kW | 73 % more or 2176.7 kW |
Loading bucket
Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm and 12700 mm | 21 % more or 3400 mm |
Carrier
Upper rollers number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
Track shoes number on either side | 48 and 47 | 2 % more or 1 |
Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 800 mm | 85 % more or 4540 mm |
3 reasons to buy Terex RH90C:
Shovel boom/sections 1
Maximum excavation depth | 8500 mm and 8090 mm | 5 % more or 410 mm |
Operation
Rotation speed | 4.6 rev / min and 3.5 rev / min | 24 % more or 1.1 rev |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 2.4 km/h and 2.2 km/h | 8 % more or 0.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Shovel boom/sections 1
Backhoe shovel boom / section | Boom 37'9" (11500mm) / Section 18' (5500mm) and boom 27'11'' (8500mm) Section 14'9'' (4500mm) |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and 2 x C18 |
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Aspiration | turbocharging and cooling at the outlet and turbocharging / air cooling |
Loading bucket
Loading bucket | Boom 29'10" (9100mm) / Section 11'2" (3400mm) and boom 23' (6400mm) Section 13'5'' (4100mm) |
Carrier
Lower rollers number | 8 and 8 |
Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 4600 mm and 800 mm |
Images
Loading bucket
19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 12700 mm |
Carrier
14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 800 mm |