- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar 325C MH vs. Komatsu PC300HD-7
Caterpillar 325C MH vs. Komatsu PC300HD-7
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325C MH:
Boom features 1
Maximum depth | 6400 mm and 5181.6 mm | 19 % more or 1218.4 mm |
4 reasons to buy Komatsu PC300HD-7:
Motor
Effective power | 180.5 kW and 129 kW | 29 % more or 51.5 kW |
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 14478 mm and 13040 mm | 10 % more or 1438 mm |
Maximum height | 16002 mm and 13730 mm | 14 % more or 2272 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 800 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
Model | 3126B ATAAC and SAA6D114E-2 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 2 and 2 |
Transmission type | Hydro-Static Transmission and hydrostatic |
Boom features 1
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | boom 8350mm Section 5450mm and 2-piece front 14.6 m 48' |
Images
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 13730 mm | 9. Maximum height | 14478 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13040 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13716 mm |
11. Maximum depth | 6400 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 5334 mm |