- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar 325C MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
Caterpillar 325C MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325C MH:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 33450 kg and 65323 kg | 49 % less or 31873 kg |
Boom features 1
| Maximum depth | 6400 mm and 6096 mm | 5 % more or 304 mm |
4 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 75 amperes and 65 amperes | 13 % more or 10 amperes |
Motor
| Effective power | 287 kW and 129 kW | 55 % more or 158 kW |
Boom features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 16764 mm and 13040 mm | 22 % more or 3724 mm |
| Maximum height | 17983.2 mm and 13730 mm | 24 % more or 4253.2 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
| Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 750 mm |
| Track width | 2920 mm and 4064 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3800 mm and 3302 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
| Model | 3126B ATAAC and SA6D140E-3 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Hydro-Static Transmission and Hydro-Static Transmission |
| Forward gears number | 2 and 2 |
Boom features 1
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | boom 8350mm Section 5450mm and 2-piece front 16.7 m 55' |
Images
Boom features 1
| 9. Maximum height | 13730 mm | 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13040 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm |
| 11. Maximum depth | 6400 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 7010.4 mm |