- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar 330D MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
Caterpillar 330D MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D MH:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 44627 kg and 65323 kg | 32 % less or 20696 kg |
7 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Motor
Effective power | 287 kW and 199.8 kW | 30 % more or 87.2 kW |
Boom features 2
Maximum depth | 7010.4 mm and -7060 mm | 201 % more or 14070.4 mm |
Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm and 16000 mm | 14 % more or 2592.8 mm |
Maximum height | 19507.2 mm and 16900 mm | 13 % more or 2607.2 mm |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 16764 mm and 14600 mm | 13 % more or 2164 mm |
Maximum height | 17983.2 mm and 15800 mm | 12 % more or 2183.2 mm |
Maximum depth | 6096 mm and -5560 mm | 191 % more or 11656 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
Track width | 3600 mm and 4064 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 5020 mm and 3302 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 750 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
Model | C9 ACERT and SA6D140E-3 |
Boom features 2
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | Long boom and 2-piece front 18.3 m 60' |
Boom features 1
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | Short handle and 2-piece front 16.7 m 55' |
Images
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 16900 mm | 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 16000 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm |
11. Maximum depth | -7060 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 7010.4 mm |