vs.

      Caterpillar 385C MH vs. Komatsu PC1250LC-8

      5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385C MH:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 6.5 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min 15 % more or 1.0 rev

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 92616 kg and 126626 kg 27 % less or 34010 kg
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 995 l. and 670 l. 33 % more or 325 l.

      Boom features 1

      Maximum height 22600 mm and 18500 mm 18 % more or 4100 mm
      Maximum radius along ground level 21800 mm and 14935.2 mm 31 % more or 6864.8 mm

      9 reasons to buy Komatsu PC1250LC-8:

      Tracked undercarriage

      Track shoes number per side 55 and 51 7 % more or 4
      Rolling bearings number on either side 10 and 9 10 % more or 1

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 142 l. and 10 l. 93 % more or 132 l.
      Engine oil volume 86 l. and 65 l. 24 % more or 21 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 501.1 kW and 382.5 kW 24 % more or 118.6 kW
      Displacement 23.2 l. and 18.1 l. 22 % more or 5.1 l.

      Hydraulic system

      Pump bandwidth 988 l/min and 980 l/min 1 % more or 8 l/min

      Boom features 2

      Maximum radius along ground level 21300 mm and 17200 mm 19 % more or 4100 mm
      Maximum height 23200 mm and 16260 mm 30 % more or 6940 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Tracked undercarriage

      Caterpillar track length on ground level 5131 mm and 5970 mm
      Track width 1231087.2 mm and 3912 mm

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Komatsu
      Model C18 ACERT and SAA6D170E-5

      Hydraulic system

      Discharge pressure 35025.3 kPa and 34335.9 kPa

      Images

      Boom features 1

      9. Maximum height 16260 mm 9. Maximum height 23200 mm
      10. Maximum radius along ground level 17200 mm 10. Maximum radius along ground level 21300 mm