- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar M322D MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
Caterpillar M322D MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar M322D MH:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 23550 kg and 65323 kg | 64 % less or 41773 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
7 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Motor
| Effective power | 287 kW and 123 kW | 57 % more or 164 kW |
Boom features 2
| Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm and 12050 mm | 35 % more or 6542.8 mm |
| Maximum height | 19507.2 mm and 13300 mm | 32 % more or 6207.2 mm |
| Maximum depth | 7010.4 mm and 2920 mm | 58 % more or 4090.4 mm |
Boom features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 16764 mm and 10820 mm | 35 % more or 5944 mm |
| Maximum height | 17983.2 mm and 12500 mm | 30 % more or 5483.2 mm |
| Maximum depth | 6096 mm and 1920 mm | 69 % more or 4176 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
| Model | C6.6 ACERT and SA6D140E-3 |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 2 and 2 |
Boom features 2
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | Boom 6.8 m / downward 5.9 m and 2-piece front 18.3 m 60' |
Boom features 1
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | Boom 6.8 m / downward 4.9 m and 2-piece front 16.7 m 55' |
Images
Boom features 1
| 9. Maximum height | 13300 mm | 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 12050 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm |
| 11. Maximum depth | 2920 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 7010.4 mm |