- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 330C MH
Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 330C MH
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC300HD-7:
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 14478 mm and 14090 mm | 3 % more or 388 mm |
Maximum height | 16002 mm and 7595 mm | 53 % more or 8407 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330C MH:
Motor
Effective power | 181.2 kW and 180.5 kW | 0 % more or 0.7 kW |
Boom features 1
Maximum depth | 14420 mm and 5181.6 mm | 64 % more or 9238.4 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 750 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | SAA6D114E-2 and C-9 ATAAC |
Gear box
Transmission type | hydrostatic and Hydro-Static Transmission |
Forward gears number | 2 and 2 |
Boom features 1
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | 2-piece front 14.6 m 48' and boom 9100mm Section 6000mm |
Images
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 16002 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7595 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 14478 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 14090 mm |
11. Maximum depth | 5181.6 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 14420 mm |