- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 385C MH
Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 385C MH
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385C MH:
Tracked undercarriage
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 7 | 22 % more or 2 |
Motor
Effective power | 382.5 kW and 180.5 kW | 53 % more or 202.0 kW |
Boom features 2
Maximum radius along ground level | 17200 mm and 13716 mm | 20 % more or 3484 mm |
Maximum height | 16260 mm and 14478 mm | 11 % more or 1782 mm |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 21800 mm and 14478 mm | 34 % more or 7322 mm |
Maximum height | 22600 mm and 16002 mm | 29 % more or 6598 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | SAA6D114E-2 and C18 ACERT |
Images
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 14478 mm | 9. Maximum height | 16260 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13716 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 17200 mm |