- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar M325C MH
Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar M325C MH
5 reasons to buy Komatsu PC300HD-7:
Motor
| Effective power | 180.5 kW and 129 kW | 29 % more or 51.5 kW |
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Boom features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 14478 mm and 14330 mm | 1 % more or 148 mm |
| Maximum height | 16002 mm and 15980 mm | 0 % more or 22 mm |
| Maximum depth | 5181.6 mm and 5000 mm | 4 % more or 181.6 mm |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar M325C MH:
Boom features 2
| Maximum height | 17140 mm and 14478 mm | 16 % more or 2662 mm |
| Maximum depth | 6400 mm and 5334 mm | 17 % more or 1066 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 15650 mm and 13716 mm | 12 % more or 1934 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SAA6D114E-2 and 3126B ATAAC |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Boom features 2
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | 3-piece front 14.0 m 46' and Lever length 7420mm |
Boom features 1
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | 2-piece front 14.6 m 48' and Lever length 6000mm |
Images
Boom features 1
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13716 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 14330 mm |
| 11. Maximum depth | 5334 mm | 11. Maximum depth | 5000 mm |
| 9. Maximum height | 14478 mm | 9. Maximum height | 17140 mm |