- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC600LC-7 vs. Caterpillar 345C Mh
Komatsu PC600LC-7 vs. Caterpillar 345C Mh
5 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Motor
| Effective power | 287 kW and 257.3 kW | 10 % more or 29.7 kW |
Boom features 2
| Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm and 18000 mm | 3 % more or 592.8 mm |
| Maximum height | 19507.2 mm and 18000 mm | 8 % more or 1507.2 mm |
Boom features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 16764 mm and 16500 mm | 2 % more or 264 mm |
| Maximum height | 17983.2 mm and 16900 mm | 6 % more or 1083.2 mm |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 345C Mh:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 5722.1 kg and 65323 kg | 91 % less or 59600.9 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
| Shoe dimensions | 750 mm and 750 mm |
| Track width | 4064 mm and 3720 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SA6D140E-3 and C13 ACERT |
Hydraulic system
| Type of pump | variable displacement piston pump and twin variable displacement piston pumps |
Boom features 2
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | 2-piece front 18.3 m 60' and Machine equipped with 18.0 m (59'11) front traction |
Boom features 1
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | 2-piece front 16.7 m 55' and Machine equipped with 16.5 m (54'2'') front traction |
Images
Boom features 1
| 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm | 9. Maximum height | 18000 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18000 mm |