- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC600LC-7 vs. Caterpillar 385C MH
Komatsu PC600LC-7 vs. Caterpillar 385C MH
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 65323 kg and 92616 kg | 29 % less or 27293 kg |
Boom features 2
| Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm and 17200 mm | 7 % more or 1392.8 mm |
| Maximum height | 19507.2 mm and 16260 mm | 17 % more or 3247.2 mm |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385C MH:
Motor
| Effective power | 382.5 kW and 287 kW | 25 % more or 95.5 kW |
Boom features 1
| Maximum height | 22600 mm and 17983.2 mm | 20 % more or 4616.8 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 21800 mm and 16764 mm | 23 % more or 5036 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
| Track width | 4064 mm and 1231087.2 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3302 mm and 5131 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SA6D140E-3 and C18 ACERT |
Images
Boom features 1
| 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm | 9. Maximum height | 16260 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 17200 mm |