- Home/
- Comparison/
- Telescopic Forklift/
- Caterpillar TH255 vs. Merlo 38.16
Caterpillar TH255 vs. Merlo 38.16
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar TH255:
Sizes
| Swing radius outside tyres | 3176 mm and 3920 mm | 19 % less or 744 mm |
Lifting
| Maximum load at maximum height | 1995.8 kg and 2500 kg | 20 % less or 504.2 kg |
| Maximum load at maximum radius | 839.1 kg and 700 kg | 17 % more or 139.1 kg |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 25.7 km/h and 25 km/h | 3 % more or 0.7 km/h |
7 reasons to buy Merlo 38.16:
Sizes
| Clearance | 350 mm and 280.4 mm | 20 % more or 69.6 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 120 l. and 64.4 l. | 46 % more or 55.6 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 l. and 90.8 l. | 39 % more or 59.2 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 74.9 kW and 62.6 kW | 16 % more or 12.3 kW |
Lifting
| Maximum lifting height | 15700 mm and 5587 mm | 64 % more or 10113 mm |
| Maximum front radius | 13000 mm and 3072.4 mm | 76 % more or 9927.6 mm |
| Maximum lifting capacity | 3800 kg and 2494.8 kg | 34 % more or 1305.2 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length up to fork surface | 3657.6 mm and 6240 mm |
| Headroom | 1905 mm and 2850 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2261.6 mm and 2760 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 12.00 x 16.5 pneumatic and 405/70-20 PR |
| Working weight | 4898.8 kg and 11730 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
Hydraulic system
| Type of pump | Gear type pump with single section and axial piston with controlled flow rate with load sensing |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length up to fork surface | 3657.6 mm | 1. Length up to fork surface | 6240 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 1905 mm | 3. Headroom | 2850 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2261.6 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2760 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 280.4 mm | 5. Clearance | 350 mm |
Lifting
| 6. Maximum lifting height | 5587 mm | 6. Maximum lifting height | 15700 mm |
| 7. Maximum front radius | 3072.4 mm | 7. Maximum front radius | 13000 mm |