vs.

      Ingersoll Rand VR642C vs. Manitou MT 523

      7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand VR642C:

      Sizes

      Clearance 406 mm and 300 mm 26 % more or 106 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 132.5 l. and 94 l. 29 % more or 38.5 l.

      Lifting

      Maximum lifting height 12802 mm and 4970 mm 61 % more or 7832 mm
      Maximum lifting capacity 3039.1 kg and 2300 kg 24 % more or 739.1 kg
      Maximum front radius 8026 mm and 3000 mm 63 % more or 5026 mm

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 3 and 1 67 % more or 2
      Reverse gears number 3 and 1 67 % more or 2

      3 reasons to buy Manitou MT 523:

      Sizes

      Swing radius outside tyres 3090 mm and 3632 mm 15 % less or 542 mm

      Lifting

      Maximum load at maximum height 2300 kg and 2721.6 kg 15 % less or 421.6 kg
      Maximum load at maximum radius 1150 kg and 453.6 kg 61 % more or 696.4 kg

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Length up to fork surface 6172 mm and 4201 mm
      Between tyres width 2591 mm and 1815 mm
      Headroom 2413 mm and 2280 mm
      Wheelbase 3048 mm and 2230 mm

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Perkins
      Model QSB4.5-3OT and 1103C 33 3

      Gear box

      Transmission type powershift transmission with soft switching and hydrostatic

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Length up to fork surface 6172 mm 1. Length up to fork surface 4201 mm
      2. Between tyres width 2591 mm 2. Between tyres width 1815 mm
      3. Headroom 2413 mm 3. Headroom 2280 mm
      4. Wheelbase 3048 mm 4. Wheelbase 2230 mm
      5. Clearance 406 mm 5. Clearance 300 mm

      Lifting

      6. Maximum lifting height 12802 mm 6. Maximum lifting height 4970 mm
      7. Maximum front radius 8026 mm 7. Maximum front radius 3000 mm