vs.

      Merlo 45.21MCTJ vs. Ingersoll Rand VR642C

      4 reasons to buy Merlo 45.21MCTJ:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 155 l. and 132.5 l. 15 % more or 22.5 l.

      Lifting

      Maximum lifting height 31700 mm and 12802 mm 60 % more or 18898 mm
      Maximum load at maximum height 400 kg and 2721.6 kg 85 % less or 2321.6 kg
      Maximum front radius 12700 mm and 8026 mm 37 % more or 4674 mm

      5 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand VR642C:

      Sizes

      Clearance 406 mm and 330 mm 19 % more or 76 mm
      Swing radius outside tyres 3632 mm and 4050 mm 10 % less or 418 mm

      Lifting

      Maximum lifting capacity 3039.1 kg and 800 kg 74 % more or 2239.1 kg
      Maximum load at maximum radius 453.6 kg and 400 kg 12 % more or 53.6 kg

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 3 and 2 33 % more or 1

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Wheelbase 2970 mm and 3048 mm
      Length up to fork surface 6600 mm and 6172 mm
      Between tyres width 2400 mm and 2591 mm
      Headroom 2950 mm and 2413 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 12 V and 12 V

      Gear box

      Transmission type hydrostatic and powershift transmission with soft switching

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Length up to fork surface 6600 mm 1. Length up to fork surface 6172 mm
      2. Between tyres width 2400 mm 2. Between tyres width 2591 mm
      3. Headroom 2950 mm 3. Headroom 2413 mm
      4. Wheelbase 2970 mm 4. Wheelbase 3048 mm
      5. Clearance 330 mm 5. Clearance 406 mm

      Lifting

      6. Maximum lifting height 31700 mm 6. Maximum lifting height 12802 mm
      7. Maximum front radius 12700 mm 7. Maximum front radius 8026 mm