- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forklift Truck/
- Caterpillar GC35K vs. Clark Michigan CSM15
Caterpillar GC35K vs. Clark Michigan CSM15
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar GC35K:
Sizes
| Clearance | 100 mm and 32 mm | 68 % more or 68 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 19.5 km/h and 4 km/h | 79 % more or 15.5 km/h |
| Rear wheels number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Lifting mechanism
| Lifting capacity | 3500 kg and 1360.8 kg | 61 % more or 2139.2 kg |
| Lifting speed | 34.1 m/min and 4.6 m/min | 87 % more or 29.5 m/min |
| Lowering speed | 29.9 m/min and 4.6 m/min | 85 % more or 25.3 m/min |
1 reasons to buy Clark Michigan CSM15:
Sizes
| Turn radius | 1530 mm and 2235 mm | 32 % less or 705 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length up to fork surface | 2510 mm and 900 mm |
| Height to overhead guard upper part | 2205 mm and 953 mm |
| Overall height with mast lowered | 2120 mm and 1911 mm |
| Maximum fork height | 3050 mm and 3810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1575 mm and 1310 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 5239 kg and 780.2 kg |
| Type of tyre | semi-pneumatic and poly-filled/rubber |
| Front wheels number | 2 and 2 |
Motor
| Fuel type | gas and Electric 24V |
Lifting mechanism
| Loading center | 500 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length up to fork surface | 2510 mm | 1. Length up to fork surface | 900 mm |
| 3. Overall height with mast lowered | 2120 mm | 3. Overall height with mast lowered | 1911 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1575 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1310 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 100 mm | 5. Clearance | 32 mm |
| 6. Height to overhead guard upper part | 2205 mm | 6. Height to overhead guard upper part | 953 mm |
| 7. Maximum fork height | 3050 mm | 7. Maximum fork height | 3810 mm |